Key comments on treatise about prison bonds

Found these comments about a lecture by Keating about prison bonds. The comments are as helpful or more helpful than the treatise.

One commenter says the court room is actually a bank; Winston Shrout has said this as well is a seminar. The grand jury creates a check (indictment) with your person as the drawee/payer. Thou mistakenly shows up and agrees to be the payer, but does not pay. They hold the body as insurance for the unpaid amount.

——————————————-

Gene handed out paperwork at his seminar.  He gave sample of International Bill of Exchange, a list of all the corporations involved in prison financing.  He had a number of sample Bonds from the GAO accounting offices.  3 come out of the federal court system, and one comes from GSA which is a bid bond, Standard Form 24, used for State cases.  He also gave the Miller Act Performance Bonds, Bid Bond, Performance Bond, and Payment Bond (reinsurance agreement in favor of the US) for the federal system.  .  He also had a 15-page Prison Treatise which is dated October 10, 2004, in which he wrote and describes what is going on with prison system financing throughout the Land.

Mike Young, with American Heritage and Law Institute, out of Cleveland, handled the seminar.

GOTOBUTTON BM_1_ MAYoung6niner20@aol.com or GOTOBUTTON BM_2_

MAYoungsixniner@aol.com

Michael Alan Young c/o6920 Thayer Rd. Mt. Vernon, Ohio

A man was offering a property in which the frontage was going to be taken on eminent domain.  When they came to him for an offer, they said we want to take your land and only pay you pennies for it.  The whole concept is they bring to you a series of negotiations.  The first time they want to see if the transaction is possible and then they go to the value of what the transaction will be. Jack has gotten emails from people that have shared copies of treasury prepaid exemption bills of exchange, the forms of these, and one guy online has shared a certified copy from a public notary, a document that he attaches of any copy that he might make of something he provided and he also sent a copy of the NY executive law statute 135, powers and duties of notary.  He did this because he runs into notaries who have no clue of what there job is, so he takes copies of the statutes of the state which authorize notaries to do things.

Gene in his seminar said that you have to get a copy of the national version of P. M. Bino’s (?} They have copies of the sample forms in that book for Notice of Protest and Certificate of Protest, which is essential in this administrative procedure.  You have copies of the forms which should be prepared by you and taken to the notary but also having the book with you shows that a public notary who has written on a national scale has brought forth the duties of the notary showing that it is a viable and necessary duty of a public notary.  Under New York Executive Laws it says: Powers and Duty in general of notaries public who are attorneys at law: Every notary public duly qualified is hereby authorizes and embowers within and throughout the state to administer oaths and affirmations, to take affidavits and depositions and to receive and certify acknowledgments or proofs of deeds, mortgages and powers of attorney and other instruments in writing.  To demand acceptance of payment of foreign or inland bills of exchange, promissory notes and obligations in writing and to protest the same for non-acceptance or nonpayment as the case may require and for use in another jurisdiction.  To exercise such other powers and duties as by the laws of nations and according to commercial usage or by the laws of any other government or country may be exercised and performed by notaries public, provided that when exercising such powers he shall set for the name of such other jurisdiction.  So there’s plenty of background here that one can take these examples, documents, proofs, to public notaries so that you can work with them to get remedies.

In Gene’s seminar he made an off-the-cuff statement that sounds frivolous, but think about it and the reality is there.  Gene said, “It’s been a business doing pleasure with you.”  He made this comment when whoever he was transacting with ended up settling honorably.  The particular settlement that Gene was talking about is when he had written a check on a closed account to Wal-Mart for $600 and the check on the closed account had gone through after the acceptance and the return and the request for post settlement and closure to Wal-Mart on an account and as usual Gene got back eventually in the mail a statement that said, “Your check’s no good, it had insufficient funds on a closed account, it’s going to come back to you NSF.”  They did not do any of the processing that Gene had explained to them and eventually the letter said he’d better call the Wal-Mart attorney immediately or they were going to have you arrested and prosecuted for a fraudulent instrument.  So Gene called the attorney who asked what he wanted them to do with the fraudulent check.  Gene never argued with him at all.  He said, “You’re an attorney and you’re holding the paperwork.”  The attorney wanted to know what Gene wanted him to do.  Well, I accepted it, I returned it, I gave you a Foreign Bill of Exchange, I’m requesting that you apply the consideration to the account in post settlement and closure and ledger the account from the debit side to the credit side with the exemption and settle this.  The attorney came back and said, OK.  Gene then said it’s been a business doing pleasure with you.

Doesn’t that make perfect sense?  Because the business was the transaction.  The closure was the pleasure.  Most people say it’s a pleasure doing business.  Business is warfare.  If you’re business is pleasure then it’s peace.  His comment was worthy because that’s where we ought to be going.

Gene’s seminar was really based upon the assumptions and presumptions that everything that goes through the courts, particularly in the so-called criminal venue is nothing more than a civil case seeking payment on a debt.  The premise is that if you go into this business transaction as though you need to dispute some facts and resolve some issues you haven’t seen the handwriting on the wall and you haven’t got a clue of what’s going on there and you’re bound to fall into the trap that has been laid for you.  It’s very obvious once you see it, but it may not appear obvious until you get your head screwed on straight that a criminal matter in a court is a commercial draft and you can look at an indictment as a bill of exchange.

If you take the premise that an indictment is a bill of exchange, then you come up with a conclusion that the three characters involved in that bill of exchange, that indictment are different than from what you first believed them to be.  Who is the drawer of the bill of exchange if an indictment is a bill of exchange?  Any thoughts?  The prosecutor?  Well, he’s an agent involved and he’s going to represent the drawer, but basically if they are following the patter of reality which is a big assumption and presumption so that they actually do have a grand jury, because they might skip a step of reality and create a fictional grand jury and just come up with it by proxy, but assuming a grand jury exists who is going to sign the indictment?  It’s the grand jury foreman.  The grand jury foreman is the drawer of the draft.  Who is the beneficiary?  The general public at large, the corporate fiction state.  The drawee is going to be the bank who is going to pay the draft, the defendant Straw-man.  So an indictment is a check.  It’s a bill of exchange.  And who is the bank who is supposed to pay the sum of money due.  The defendant.  Once the indictment is drawn up the check has already been executed.  What’s left in the process?  Collection.  Are we talking about a trial here?  The trial’s irrelevant, the check has already been drafted on a closed account.  It’s not drawn on a public account yet.  So this check has been drawn on a closed account?  How much is due?  Law is not voodoo hooey….they’ve got a system to it. What Gene was telling us is that every statute that is passed by any level of this democracy government is a bond.  It’s purpose in passing the statute is raising a revenue.  That’s why they pass laws…….to raise revenue.  So every statute is a bond and there is a value set on the bond, so every time the Straw-man is charged in a charging instrument….isn’t a check a charging instrument?  Why is a check a charging instrument?  Because it’s on the liability side of the account, the credit side of the account.  The credit side of the account is the liability side.  The debit side is the asset side.  It’s all backwards since they went to no money.  And so every charging instrument is a credit instrument.  And a credit instrument is a liability and is a sum of money due.  There is no money in circulation.  So every check is a charging instrument.  It is going to charge the account isn’t it, when it goes to the drawee, the Straw-man.  So the Straw-man fiction has been charged with a violation of the corporate statutes and that has a valuation based upon the original statute and what it’s intent was to raise the revenue.

So once the indictment, and we don’t have to limit ourselves to indictment, after all if an information it’s a charging instrument, if it’s a citation it’s a charging instrument and the whole issue is that the Straw-man has been charged to pay the instrument.  What does this have to do with a trial and an argument?  There is no argument, there is no trial, this is a check.  You either pay it or you don’t.  And so like Gene said the charging instrument has already charged the Straw-man.  Now here’s you, are you the Straw-man?  No.  Did they charge you?  No.  You’re a Third Party.  If you get involved between the drawer and the drawee what have you just done.  You’ve become a party in the matter, and you’ve stepped in from the outside and inserted yourself between a couple of foreigners and you’ve now become liable by your interference in their action.  You think you’re going to go to a trial and prove a matter.  This is a commercial charging instrument.  It has nothing to do with the trial.  Why would we go to a trial?  The facts are irrelevant.  There’s no law. We can’t change anything anyway.

What Gene was trying to show us is that if, in fact, the Charging Instrument is a check what is the real purpose of the court?  To collect the payment from the drawee.  That is the only purpose of the court: they are an accounting, closing house.  They are there to see if the drawee is going to settle and close the commercial transaction which is the check which was written on the Defendant.  Like Gene said, the only remedy that you have is to go in as a Third Party Intervener in behalf of the drawee to do settlement and closure on the transactional instrument which created the account.  The simple reality is that since it appears in their world that you the living soul are linked to the defendant Straw-man by name, if you don’t come in and close the account you are in dishonor, as any bank would be, if the bank does not pay the Bill of Exchange which is presented to it for settlement and closure.  If the bank does not accept and pay the draft written on it, it’s in dishonor.  And it, the bank becomes liable now for the sum of money due.  Since your Straw-man is in fact a dead entity, it does not operate itself.  Living people operate the fictional entity known as the Straw-man.

If you are sovereign and responsible and a living soul, you have a moral, a commercial and a spiritual duty as the fiduciary to honorably handle the affairs of the de facto corporation known as your Straw-man.  You can either do it as the Creditor/Trustee or as the Owner/Operator/Beneficiary of that trust.  The choice is yours.  If you are trustee/fiduciary you have limited liability and the debts of the Straw-man are not the debts of the trustee.  Nevertheless you as the trustee have a duty as a fiduciary to help settle and close whatever commercial actions come against that corporate de facto entity/trust (Straw-man).  One of the ways you can handle that as the Fiduciary/Creditor Trustee is to offer the exemption of the living soul for the post settlement and closure of the debts of the de facto corporate Straw-man if in fact you have registered on the UCC-1 and have demonstrated by public registration that you have that status and standing to do that.

Gene said that once an indictment and information/citation/complaint are filed in the court, a check has been drawn and the Straw-man is the bank, he is the drawee and is responsible for the debt.  The only thing you can do as the trustee is to accept the offer, return the offer for offer and consideration for post settlement and closure of the account and the case.  Otherwise what happens in the court is very simple.  The court recognizes that you as the trustee or as the accommodation party to the defendant by your argument (or your attorney/public defender’s argument) are in dishonor of your duty to pay the instrument.  And because of that dishonor the court has to go to Plan 2.  Plan 1 is to presume that the drawee or the trustee representing the drawee or any of the drawee’s associates acting as co-defendants will pay the debt.  Notice we’re not talking about finding facts, arguing or anything else.  We’re talking about paying the debt.  Plan 2 is Plan 1 failed because nobody is going to pay the debt, they’re going to argue and be in dishonor.  So Plan 2 is we’re going to sell the debt to some 3rd Party who is going to buy the debt.  And in order to hold a security for the outsider who bought the debt and paid the price, we’re going to put the defendant, his associates or the trustee representing the defendant in jail as surety for the 3rd party who purchased the debt.  And, we will hold them in jail as collateral to the 3rd party until the time works the payment of the debt off back to the 3rd party investor.

The name of the game is you can settle and close the draft yourself as the trustee staying on the Creditor side, or you can act like a lunatic and argue the case or do anything else you want and end up going to jail because you are in a commercial dishonor and somebody else will pay that draft in your behalf but you will spend time in jail as the collateral for that payment until you work off the money over time.  Don’t they say people in jail are working off their Debt to Society?  Now you know why they tell you that.  So part of understanding the background of what Gene is bringing to us is understanding the basic premise.  Like Gene said time and time again, they tell you it’s criminal in order to confuse you so you will not know that you are there on a civil matter.  Why isn’t it criminal?  They’re insolvent and have no capacity to bring crimes against anyone.  Not only that to bring a criminal charge against someone requires a civil case to begin with.  Well don’t they have civil case?  Isn’t the Straw-man an asset belonging to the national government? Didn’t they create him for the purpose of raising a secret revenue from the people.  Don’t they hold the titles and the commercial paper on the Straw-man (birth certificates), so don’t they have a civil cause of action.  If the Straw-man is a 14th amendment citizen resident of the US under article 14 and amendment, does the Straw-man have the capacity to question the debt or raising a revenue off the debt?  If you truly understand the 14th article and amendment and they’ve charged the Straw-man, which is a fiction, and not you the living man, are there any Constitutional protections in place here?  Absolutely not because the Constitution doesn’t protect fictions.  It protects living people and the government isn’t charging living people, it’s charging the fiction corporation and the fiction corporation isn’t you.  And, the fiction corporation belongs to their civil society under their civil law and civil contracts.

So, by being a citizen/resident doesn’t the Straw-man have a duty civilly by contract to obey the statutes and the laws of their civil de facto society?  You bet.  And if it violates the laws of the civil society, isn’t it subject to the penal clauses of the civil contract to pay the fines and obligations of the violation of the civil statutes.  You bet.  Since he’s a fiction and not real and not you they can charge their own creation all they want.  They’re not charging you.  Therefore, there’s no constitutional violations or prohibitions.  It doesn’t come under the presumptions of the de jure government.  They’re not violating any laws.  They’re not harming real people.  If you want to step into this mess and be drawn in and get harmed as a result of your ignorance and actions don’t blame them.  Don’t charge them with destroying your government, constitutional violations. They haven’t done anything.  They’ve created a world of illusion and they’ve asked you to come into the “Matrix” and “play with us” for a while at your own risk.

Gene was saying here is [where] they go ahead and charge the Straw-man and the goal is to see who they are going to capture by creating this fiction.  Remember we said a few months ago it’s a premise of law that you cannot sue yourself.  If the Straw-man belongs to the very government that’s brought the suit against their own Straw-man, aren’t they suing themselves?  You bet.  Isn’t that the height of fiction and illusion?  You bet.  What changes it into reality?  When a foreigner steps into one of those characters.  And now it’s not the government against it’s own creation anymore; it’s the government against a lunatic who stepped into this illusion and made it real because now we have two different parties.

Gene talked about the concept of underwriter.  On a lot of commercial transactions you hear about the concept of an underwriter.  And what is an underwriter?  In insurance lingo isn’t an underwriter someone who comes in and purchases a part or all of the securities that are being issued by a corporation to make a revenue?  And the underwriter will lend his organization, his name, his character in order to purchase these securities and resubmit them onto the commercial market place for general purchase , exchange and trade.  When you are an underwriter, which got it’s name because you put your name under the person’s name who was liable, you underwrote their name, assuming liability.  You co signed.  What is an accommodation party?  Isn’t an accommodation party one who lends his name to some one else and will be responsible to settle and close his debts if the other party does not do so.  When they charged the corporate Straw-man fiction with the citation, the complaint, the indictment, the information, it’s a check and the banker, the one who’s got to pay that check is the Defendant.  Hasn’t the defendant become liable to pay the instrument, the criminal charge?  You bet.

When you come into the case as a living party you become the underwriter for the dead corporation/ defendant bank.  Isn’t an underwriter one who purchases the bonds all or part, to settle and close the case.  So when you as a living soul come into the criminal case without explaining what your capacity is in that case, and without qualifying it (and the public defender/attorney defending you won’t qualify it), the court assumes you the living man are the underwriter of the draft to make the payment.  Is there any wonder why the living man goes to jail when the draft has been paid in post settlement and closure?  And you’re (or your public defender/ attorney) is still arguing the facts which are irrelevant.  Protesting your innocence and that you are not guilty of these facts?  It never had anything to do with the facts and the charges.  They are irrelevant.  It was purely a revenue making device and the plain, simple reality is you intervened not as an intervener creditor, you came in a general capacity as an accommodation party underwriter assuming the liability of the Straw-man/defendant fiction corporation to the charging instrument which was a check to be paid.  You never paid it , you’re in dishonor and you’re in prison because you became the underwriter.  And, you were responsible and the debt wasn’t paid.  They had to go to a 3rd party.   Do you understand what’s going on in a criminal case?  It’s that simple.

What Gene did was fill out a lot of information.  One of the things he talked about is that by the time a charging instrument is created in a court, the charging instrument created behind it is called a Bid Bond.  And the Bid Bond is the evidence of the sum of money due on the debt of the charging instrument to settle and close that account.  Every time a criminal case is started in any court a Bid Bond is already filled out.  And what Gene was showing us through his research is that if it is a state court, the bid bond is most likely the GSA form 24.  And it says right at the top of the form “BID BOND.”  If you’re in a federal district court, the BID BOND is most likely going to be GSA standard form 275.  It’s the agreement in favor of the US.  Form 273 is a reinsurance performance bond and standard form 274 is a Payment bond.  Gene said there are 3 bonds for every case.  There is a bid bond, a performance bond and a payment bond. The Bid Bond is the bond that sets the value of the draft, the amount of money they are looking for to settle and close the case.  A Bid Bond has already been issued when the case is lodged in the court.  It’s issued by the clerk to establish this.

Gene said the federal district courts buy up all of the State Bid Bonds.  Why not?  What happened in 1933 when the Governors pledged all of the assets of the corporate states to discharge the liability of the corporate UNITED STATES.  Wasn’t that what the Constitution was all about?  That the states became accommodation parties to the national debt and in 1929 and 1933 when this was called in didn’t the Governors meet and turn over all the assets of the states to the UNITED STATES to help settle and close the national debts?  You bet.  If the corporate STATES (NM, AZ, etc) are generating any income by writing bills of exchange on the Straw-man bankers for the violation of the state corporate statutes doesn’t it make sense that would turn over the proceeds of all that income to the feds to be applied to the settlement and closure of the national debt.

And so Gene’s research shows that the federal district courts are buying up all the bid bonds for all the criminal charges from the state and local municipal courts and these are funneled up to the federal district courts and the clerk’s office where all of these bid bonds are assembled and packaged for sale to help finance the government.  A bid bond is at the lowest level stating what the expectation of revenue is off this bill of exchange that has been written.  The indictment is a bill of exchange.  And the Straw-man is the banker who is supposed to bring in the money.  Now is the Straw-man going to able to bring in money?  Not unless the Straw-man holds assets or acquires income and if he has income coming in or assets won’t eventually the court’s garnish, foreclose, seize, levy, convert the assets of the defendant Straw-man to settle and close the account if the Straw-man’s operators or trustees do not voluntarily do so?  You bet.  Isn’t that what the courts do?  Issue garnishments?  Levies?   Sales to close the Bill of Exchange.

You never thought of a traffic citation as a bill of exchange did you?  You never thought of being charged with Murder 1 as being a check that they were asking you for money.  How much different is this scheme than what Martin Luther railed against the so-called indulgences?  We’ll forgive you, just send us your money.  I bet you thought they got rid of indulgences 400 to 500 years ago (Lynn’s note……..Paul said there were indulgences that could be ‘bought’ in the Catholic Church when he was growing up in the 40’s and 50’s in New Mexico) .  Well, good news, who do you think is running the civil law?  Isn’t it the Jesuits?  (Lynn’s note: read F. Tupper Saussy, Rulers of Evil).  Aren’t you seeing exactly what went on before going on again?  They just call it a different name so that you will be confused and not understand from history what is happening?  So they’re just asking for a little donation, just send us a little bit of indulgence here and we’ll forgive you if you can understand the process.  Otherwise, we’ll put you in jail and torture you a little bit and go through some inquisition with you too.  So the BID BOND goes in.

Since the government figures it has a sum of money due, isn’t that what the bank is supposed to do is pay a sum of money due on a bill of exchange?  So they have the expectation of money coming in.  This is before the trial, before the plea, before anything.  After all it is a check, and it’s written so we can expect this to be coming in.  So we gather these things together now, but they have a problem.  What happens if they can’t collect on one of these?  But they already have planned on using it, right?    The funds they feel are going to be there and they’re going to get them one way or the other and they’re planning on the fact that ‘Bob Cook’ owes $500 on his driving without a license so that we can patch the road down here going into Cleveland.  And we’re going to hire the contractor to go patch the road and it may take awhile before we’re going to get the money out of ‘Bob Cook’ but we want to spend the funds now.  So what are we going to do just in case, by accident, we can’t collect the money from ‘Bob Cook.’  We’re going to insure it and we’re going to go to somebody that will put out a risk and say they are willing to pay ‘Bob Cook’s’ $500 if you can’t get it out of him or any part of it, in return for you giving me a portion of the expected $500.  So what they do is they purchase a performance bond from an insurance company who gets paid part of what it is they are expecting to come from Bob so that if Bob never delivers anything, the insurance company will have to cough up the whole $500 so the government can get the road done and paid for without worrying about it.  That’s called the Performance Bond.

What Gene said is the way the system is set up, the parties that will provide the performance bond can only be those parties which have already been pre-registered and pre-approved by the military, corporate democracy government that has a list of all the pre approved sureties for performance and you can usually find these on the administrative clerk’s website in the U. S. DISTRICT COURTS….who is approved to do this.  Once the performance bond has been issued to back up the bid bond, the government has now been insured against any potential loss of revenue from collecting from dead beats, even like ‘Bob’ who isn’t going to pay it, because he doesn’t believe he owes it.  If ‘Bob’ stiffs them for the bid bond, and the insurance company that posted the performance bond has to come up with the payment where’s the insurance company going to get the funds to pay off their claim?  Remember, Bob’s a dead beat and didn’t pay a penny.

The insurance companies are in business and they’ve got customers and their rates go up for providing performance bonds when the number of dead beats go up.  In essence since all of society is a joint maritime venture the good paying members of the admiralty venture always end up getting stiffed to take care of the liabilities of the dead beats.  Isn’t that what the maritime venture is for anyway?  Those people that are fortunate have to pay for those people that are less fortunate.   Isn’t this called socialism?  And so the Land of the Free and the Home of the Brave, being operated under admiralty/military commercial covering is nothing more than a socialistic system.  It’s not capitalism at the highest level.  It’s being run on a commercially socialistic system.  It’s just that in the background this is what is happening and people don’t understand it and so they’ve been led to believe that the Lie is the Truth, and the Truth is the Lie, and this is a private system of capitalism.  Isn’t the insurance compelled on all the capitalistic performers?  If the capitalistic players have to carry the maritime insurance the system rests on socialism not private individual capitalism.  However, you can see that the intent of the civil, military, democracy government is to confuse most of the People most of the time to get full compliance within the admiralty commercial system mandating insurance coverage by everyone.  So that the system without money can proceed.  Because when you have no money, you can’t do business in private capitalism.

The performance insurance companies provide performance bonds to indemnify the government who gets 100% minus the cost of the Performance Bond to do business. As long as the cost of providing performance bonds does not eat too much into the gross receipts from the “Little Scam” they’re doing a very healthy business.   As soon as the system breaks down and the cost of bonding and insuring the project goes higher than the rewards of the project, then the system will probably fail.  So far all we have is an expectation of the revenue from the bid bond.  And then we have a performance bond which will guarantee something if we can’t collect.  But here is the problem.  If we don’t actually collect any of the money, who’s going to get stuck to pay the cost of the government?  The Performance Bond holder, right?  If they don’t get any revenue in, he’s got to pay the whole thing.  What would the premium be for the guy who buys a performance bond when nobody is making the payment on the bid bond?  100% plus more for administrative costs.  Would the government maintain a revenue then, if they had to provide 105% of the expected income to insure the system.  No, the system would fail.  How are they going to collect the money?

Well, once you have all these bid bonds and they’ve been insured (double witness), can’t you bring these together as security offerings?  You bet.  You can package these collectively as a security.  What is a

Security?  It’s a promise that somebody is going to pay a sum of money in the future, right?  Isn’t that what the bill of exchange was?  The Charging Instrument, the Indictment against the so-called bad, heinous criminal?  So there expecting eventually to collect some money out of him, right?  On this check that they wrote against his Straw-man.  So by the time they have the bid bond and the performance bond insuring it, they gather all these things together and they go to a securities dealer, an underwriter.  The securities dealer goes, oh you have some checks there that should get paid. $10 million for Caleb who murdered his girl friend last week, and $500 from ‘Bob’ who drove without a license again, etc. etc.  We’ve collected these again in billion dollar packets.   And now you take them to this underwriter and what was the purpose of the underwriter?  He’s going to purchase all or a part of the securities, make a market for them in the public and resell them on the stock exchange.  Now if there’s a company called Paine Webber that buys up all of these promises to pay, by the tens of hundreds of billions of dollars and holds them as assets, shouldn’t the value of the expectations of their futures profits go up?  And shouldn’t the value of the Paine Webber stock increase because of that? What you’ve just done then is taken all of these bills of exchange, i.e., indictments, traffic tickets, information, complaints, and bundled them as though they are income generating commercial items and made a market where they are traded on the public market place and investors can provide the money and/or we also expect that the people who are liable on the instruments are going to provide the money too?  But some way, shape or form we are going to make the money by selling the guy’s check to someone who will purchase it for pennies on the dollar in the hopes that he’s going to go back and collect the full amount from the Straw-man through collections by attorneys and legal systems or else the guy’s eventually going to make the payment and settle and close the account.  Well, if he dishonors Caleb then he goes to jail because they’ve sold the account to a stranger and as security for the stranger’s return on investment they are holding the living man in jail as the collateral or the merchandise if you will, to secure the security lending new interest in what scripture says Babylon is just buying and selling the souls of men, putting them into prison to make a revenue to build the great society.

How did they trap you into their venture?  They trapped you into their venture by naming a Straw-man corporation after you, writing a check against their corporation and hoping you would intercede and interfere (with the help of your public defender/attorney) legally, that under commercial law you would become a voluntary Accommodation Party liable for the debts of the corporate Straw-man.  Who is to blame for the unfortunate circumstances that befall the people in jail?  They themselves because they were ignorant lending more credence to the Scripture that says: “My people fail because of lack of knowledge.”  They have been snared and they have been taken because they do not know who they are and they do not know who that so-called corporate government is, that is acting in a capacity of  foreigners to God’s people.  If you go to the Book of Proverbs it will tell you many times that he who becomes a surety, an accommodation party for a stranger, a fictitious foreign corporation, he has no one but himself to blame.  So what is the remedy.

The remedy as Gene pointed out in his mini-six hour seminar (he could take up to three days) we as living souls have the standing, status and capacity if we understand who we are and how to do it to issue both the Bid Bond, the Performance Bond and the Underwriting Bond as a foreign bill of exchange through the living Party not to be a surety and accommodation party for the Debtor but because of our status and standing as an outside Creditor to come in and pay off these liabilities for the Straw-man corporation for post-settlement and closure of the accounting in the case and it’s gone.

Along with this it’s one thing to say Gene’s done all this research and this is a pipedream. The criminal system is about protecting society against evil people.  It has nothing to do with raising revenue.  You guys are crazy.  Well, okay if you want to be in Never Land that’s okay.  However, there are people out there who’ve been dealing with these issues and the results are incredible.  Jack had a call from his friend Scott last week.  He’s talked about him on tape.  He was in prison and he did something to settle and close his case and they threw him from the federal prison into a private prison.  Then he tried settlement and closure for that and before you knew it they threw him out of the private prison.  He was on probation.  This has been for the last year.  Victoria [Joy] was on probation in California also.

Jack Smith tape 2 Nov. 1, A. D. 2004

If you remember Victoria was on probation after they threw her out of jail and she accepted that and returned and wrote a Bill of Exchange for post-settlement and closure and before long she got this strange letter from the other county saying she didn’t have to go to a distant count to report in, she could report in the county where she lived.  To which Victoria responded, “Conditionally I’d be happy to if you can show where they’ve moved a contract so that there is a charge for me to report.”  Remember one of the things Gene Keating said in his seminar is that you must have a charge to accept and if there is no charge, there is nothing there.  And, if you can’t see a charge which has been issued so that you can do an acceptance and return, they may just be ‘floating’ the possibility of a contract and an agreement by you.  So what Victoria did she didn’t create a controversy by saying she wouldn’t report, she said she’d be happy to show up at this county where I live instead of the distant county on proof of charge that there is a duty for her to do so.  The next thing she heard from them was basically ‘never mind.’  So obviously, there wasn’t a charge there, there was just an invitation to volunteer.

If you remember Victoria did inform the probation board when she was traveling here and there and out of state, she wasn’t asking.  She was saying if you have anything you want to contact me about or you need some kind of authorization let her know, she’d be happy to give it to them.  So, she acted like a Creditor to the probation department, not as the Defendant/Debtor.  And pretty soon she heard nothing for awhile.  Then she went on the Internet and found out they had issued a warrant and there’s a warrant issued against the Straw-man.  That would mean they were going to come after her and arrest her anyplace.  She didn’t think they were settling and closing the account like she had asked them to.  So it appeared there was a new damage and she needed to get it settled and closed because the computer says there is a warrant.  For a long time Victoria and Jack were wondering that you couldn’t charge these People and so why was there a warrant there?

This last week, Scott called Jack and said that the last time he had talked to Jack they were going to hold a hearing.  Scott didn’t go to the hearing but instead sent a request to see if they’d done post-settlement and

closure.  The next thing he knew he was informed that a warrant had issued.  Any of us, if we hear that a government entity has issued a warrant against our Straw-man, have the instant reaction, an assumption and presumption that they are “out to get me.”  Isn’t that the instant assumption?  What did Victoria assume?  They are out to get her.  They put it on the Internet and anytime now, when she’s in Ohio, Florida, or somewhere else they’re going to look her up and arrest her.  Isn’t that the presumption?

Scott assumed they were trying to arrest him.  Jack asked if he’d looked into it.  He said, “Yes, I’ve got contacts.”  Scott had some acquaintances in law enforcement go on the computers. What did they say?  They said that yes there was a warrant there but they didn’t think if they stopped him that they would pick him up on that warrant.  The law enforcement acquaintance said he wouldn’t risk picking up Scott because something looked strange on the warrant.  Scott had an attorney acquaintance working in the government and called this attorney and asked him to look up the warrant.  The attorney called back and said that yes there was a warrant there, but it was not the type of warrant on which anyone would arrest Scott.  So Scott called the federal district clerk of court and asked about the warrant posted on the account.   The clerk admitted there was a warrant posted on the account.  Scott requested a copy of the warrant to which the clerk answered she could not do that.  Scott replied that he had asked for post settlement and closure and she said, “Sir I can assure you this case is closed.”

Jack has had other people tell him that when they had tendered Bills of Exchange they have been told the case was closed.  The clerk said to Scott, “Not only is the case closed, it’s been sent to archives.”  Scott said he was still concerned about the warrant.  The clerk said, “Sir this is like an account warrant.” or something to that effect.  So Scott, called Jack and asked what he thought was going on.  Jack asked, “Did Victoria ask the court for post-settlement and closure?” Yes.  Did Scott ask the court for post settlement and closure?  Yes.  In order to settle the accounting what do they need for settlement?  Don’t they need a draft?  Wasn’t the bill of exchange a draft on the private side?  Many times when you draft them by a bill of exchange on the private side, does the account close right away?  No.  Why not?  You need a ‘second witness.’  Where does that second witness come from?  Doesn’t it have to come from the public side of the account?  How is the clerk going to do the accounting on the public side unless she gets a draft?  What is a warrant?  Isn’t a warrant a check or a draft?  So, when she posted the last warrant that closed the public side of the account and they archived it.

Victoria assumed the notice of the warrant was a potential arrest against her.  And Scott assumed that when they posted the warrant as the last transaction on the account it was a seizure warrant for collection against him.  The warrant was the funds on the public side for the second witness to settle the account exactly like he had said.  But they settled it by calling it a warrant to test Victoria and Scott to see if they were going to come in and reopen it by argument.  They just didn’t tell Victoria and Scott what kind of warrant it was.   They gave Victoria and Scott half the truth, “We’ve got a warrant out on this account.”  Well, thanks doesn’t that mean you’ve settled and closed now by applying the funds from the warrant to close out the public credits?  See, there’s two sides of the accounting and it takes two bills of exchange and that last warrant was what just might settle that court unless you are stupid enough to argue and open it up again.  We are our own worst enemy by not understanding the language and what’s going on here.

Lee’s (class member) comments: The warrants are publicly posted for 90 days.   This shows settlement.

Jack:  The clerk needs an order to settle and close the account.  And that’s what the warrant is, an order to settle and close the account.  Lee: That’s right

Jack: Remember when we’ve talked in the past and the clerk says she has the bill of exchange and can’t do anything with it, so she just puts it in the file.  What the clerk is looking for is a warrant on the public side to settle and close the whole account.  And they call it a warrant which is one of those scary terms that the public certainly doesn’t understand and we only understand it in the private when we understand what the warrant really is: it’s an order and check to settle and close something.

Lee: It could also be worded as a conclusion, a final settlement.  They can make that any kind of public posting they want.  I’ve also seen it as order of the court, but it’s a conclusion of the court, the final posting of the results of hearing.  It’s an interesting what they’ll do and they’ll post it for ninety days.  Even though received nothing but, “this is dead, this is closed.”  There has been no action.  But there has to be a financial settlement.   That always concerned Lee, because ninety days passes and then it disappears.  So, did someone buy it?

Jack: That could well have happened if you didn’t close it.

Lee: But they only do it for ninety days so what happens if they don’t sell for ninety days.  Did they rename it and stick it somewhere else?  There’s a bit of confusion with the process and this is the second time Lee has heard this condition of calling the posting a warrant and they post it and when you go and try to find out what it’s all about there isn’t any apprehension.   They’re not going to be apprehended at all.  It’s not like there’s a debt left to pay.

Jack: See, if you haven’t paid the debt to settle the case and when you pay the debt and you do the bill of exchange and the draft, it’s on the private side.  They need some kind of a public order to duplicate that to settle and close the case.

Lee: They need to reflect it….as mirror.

Jack: If that happens, it’s good.  On the other side of the coin, like Jack was shown here, if you default in not paying the debt on the private side, generally the court will enter an order of conviction against the defendant and all the accommodation parties associated therewith, showing the debt is in default.  Now you can appeal that, but that’s never a good sign.  When you’re on appeal it means the account hasn’t been settled privately and you’re in dishonor.  So why would you have a tendency to prevail in the appellate court whenever your appeal going up is an automatic sign of your dishonor for having failed to settle and close the account.  So the presumption on the appeal goes against you from the get go because you are a debtor in dishonor.  And the only time you’re going to win that is if the procedure on trying to collect the account fell through the cracks on being grossly outside the procedure of honorably trying to collect a debt.

Lee: That’s all the appeal is–it’s on the legality of the proceedings to collect a debt.  It’s not the argument and has nothing to do with the argument.

Jack: The issue that’s being raised in the alleged case is on the moon.  The appeal is only on the legality of the process they used in admiralty to collect a debt.  Since you’re up on appeal you’ve dishonored the draft and the party coming up and taking the appeal is in dishonor to the merits of the collection process.

Lee: The appeal really doesn’t do anything but shove it down to the lower court for further collection process.  In other words, fix it.  Lee has been sending out a packet, the Monday night packet, which has acceptance, bills of exchange examples, signing in a fiduciary, about as much information as he could collect reflecting what they have been going on Monday night.  Lee waited all summer for the results of what they were doing before sending out the packet.  It’ll be updated again, but it’s up to the point of the bill of exchange, with examples, how to notify secretary of treasury, and handle conditions which have worked for others.  He has included information showing how to do the acceptance and the follow up and the certificates of dishonor.

This is all instructional information to be used and followed up by you. There are examples to help you do your own paperwork.  Fill in the blanks and glean from the examples for your own paperwork. You can order from Lee by money order for $10 for the 50 plus pages and please leave the money order blank.

Is There Justice

PO Box 24670

Cleveland, Ohio 44124

This takes you through acceptance and how to do the certificates of dishonor and much more.

Jack: Gene did a couple more things that were interesting.  There’s a part of the UCC that says to make an indorser liable on an instrument, the party that holds it must make a presentment. Many times there are staple contracts like mortgages in which the terms and conditions are such that you confess judgment and that you waive presentment, etc.  For the principal on the instrument sometimes presentment is not necessary by the terms of the contract. Assume you’re going thru mortgage foreclosure in a judicial state. They charge the Straw-man who was the maker of the mortgage note in the judicial proceedings and they tend to do a dress service of the complaint upon the Straw-man which is done really for an illusion and an ulterior reason. Since the Straw-man has already waived presentment and notice and has confessed judgment, theoretically the banks could come in and have the sheriff seize the assets of the Straw-man for the liability.

In fact if they serve the Straw-man and nobody ever shows up to the court to defend, that by reason of the rules of procedure of their admiralty proceedings, the failure to appear becomes a dishonor, confesses the judgment a second time (first on the contract, second on the failure to show up in court). So you have a double witness of confessed judgment at which time the sheriff can advertise, appraise and sell the property. The court can seize the property and put the new purchaser in possession all without having to hear boo! from you and you as the living soul don’t have to show up in the court.

What happens if you don’t show up in the court and they take judgment against the assets of the Straw-man and then they do not have sufficient collateral to seize or levy to pay the debt. Do they have personam jurisdiction against the living soul? No. You weren’t named on the complaint and you didn’t show up. So what they’re doing is completing the action in rem, not in personam. And because they’re completing the action in rem they are limited to acquiring the value of whatever they get off the seizure, levy and sale of the goods of the Straw-man.

If you show up in court and you start to argue as the living man, what have you done? You have become an accommodation party and appeared in personam. And without paying the debt you are in dishonor and now you can be held personally for the liability of the account. The reason they go to court is because when we go back to make an endorser liable on a note they must do presentment. Isn’t the living soul signed on the instrument, but he’s not the principal. He’s not the Straw-man unless he wants to be? So don’t they have to do presentment, service of process as though it’s coming onto him so he has knowledge that they’re presenting it to a living soul to become liable as the accommodation because he’s not the principal He may back the principal, the Straw-man, but he’s not the principal. They need him to come in so they can do presentment against him but they don’t have to do presentment against the Straw-man.

The reason the court case is there is to give notice to the living soul so that the living soul will come in and act as the Accommodation Party to which he’s now been told he’s been presented, you’ve been given notice and you’re an accommodation party and you now have a liability. So they drug him in, in personal. They had to do that because he could never waive his rights. If he waived his rights wouldn’t it be a constitutional violation? But there’s no constitution for the STRAWMEN who waived his rights by the statute stable contract. So they’ll go against the assets that are registered to the Straw-man and that’s not a violation of the constitution. But if they come against you as a living soul and try to make you liable to pay the obligations of the Straw-man, they’ve got to give you notice and opportunity because you are merely an Accommodation Party for the Straw-man.

They invite you in and you fall into the trap and become the Debtor, instead of the Creditor. Gene was saying, “You have to make the bid.”  They are looking for money. The problem is, there isn’t any money in the public.  Because the public hasn’t declared what money is. So the only place they can get the money is from the private side. Can they tell the private side what they can or cannot use as money? No. They can’t tell real people what to do. They are a fiction and they can only tell fictions what to do. So they can come to you a real person and solicit you and if you want to act as though you know what money is and give it to them, they’ll take it every day, but they haven’t got any over there. They haven’t defined money.

If they are going to use anything as money, which they haven’t defined what it is, it can’t originate on the public side because there isn’t anything to find. For them to use and circulate in commerce things they’re going to use as or call money, it’s got to come from the private side. It’s got to come from living people. And since it comes from you, is there reason why you can’t underwrite the bid, the surety and the payment? Since it all comes from the private side anyway. So why do you allow them to use your signature so that you become liable for whatever it is that they are circulating as a credit on the public side and they’re taking advantage of all of that because you were ignorant enough to provide what it is that you’ve got that creates it that they don’t have. Are you going to only allow the bid money and then allow them to base their activities on your credit to issue corporate surety and corporate payment? Why don’t you also issue surety and payment? Gene’s position exactly.

All the patriots are going around for decades and decades yelling government has stolen our sovereignty. Isn’t that what they’ve been saying? How could a fiction steal your sovereignty? Government can’t steal anything out of reality, you have to give it up. So if you’ve lost your sovereignty, the only way you lost it, it wasn’t what government did, not what they charged you with, it’s not the laws they wrote, it’s not the fact they have all the guns and wear all the badges, not the fact that they have a president and a court system, you lost your sovereignty when you gave up your commercial capacity by being ignorant.

Government is not evil. They may be very deceptive, but they drew the sovereignty out of you because you are too ignorant to be sovereign because you don’t know what a sovereign is and what a sovereign does. And because they drew out from you what you don’t even understand what you’ve got, you blamed them for stealing your sovereignty and you don’t know how they got it away from you. They have become in place of the sovereign because we’re collectively ignorant of what a sovereign is. And we allow them to drain our sovereignty away by being ignorant. That’s not anything they beat out of you or forced out of you, except thru your ignorance. You are the Principal for the bid, the living man, not the Straw-man. You can also be the reinsurer to guarantee the bid. And by the use of your exemption you are the underwriter on this whole procedure. You just have to understand what’s going on, who you are, understand who they are, the procedure for getting the remedy. They have taken nothing away from you that you have not yourself surrendered.

Do you understand the procedure for getting the remedy? There is no money. Everything is and acts like insurance. You have what is called a bank check with a commercial bank. Whose name is on top of that check? The bank’s name. Your Straw-man basically has an account in that bank, correct? And you believed that bank had money and that if you wrote a check on your Straw-man’s account the bank would pay it. There is no money. Where did your signature and your Straw-man’s name go on the check? Under the bank’s name. Did it not? Was your Straw-man an underwriter of the bank?

Let’s go back to Gene Keating’s 3 sets of bonds: a bid bond, a performance bond, and an underwriter. Where does the payment finally come from on those three bonds? The underwriter. Whose name/slash signature is on the bottom of the instrument? The living man’s signature. He is the underwriter on that instrument. Did the bank have any money? No, never did, never will. Who’s responsible for producing the money? The underwriter, the guy that signed the check. Does that prove to you that as a living soul you have the capacity to put out the third and final bond if you understand who you are and what you are doing? You are the underwriter guaranteeing payment on that instrument. That is not a check to produce money, it’s an insurance policy. And you’re the underwriter, hoping against hope that money will somehow exist to make the payment on the instrument that you signed.

Under the new banking act that is taking effect very shortly what is the new procedure with banks as far as checks are concerned? You will not get the original check back once it’s processed through the insurance scheme. You will get a photocopy. It’s a promise to pay. It is a security that they are going to hold on to. Making me liable. They are going to bundle them together and even as you are the private underwriter they are sending these canceled checks to public underwriters and offer them as securities to build the great Babylonian society on your promise to pay. Why would they send them back. Do you think anybody paid them? There’s no money to pay them with. It’s an insurance policy. They’re keeping as a holder, the evidence of the policies that you are writing. You’re part of a giant insurance scheme. Does that prove to all you patriots out there that there is no common law?  Nothing gets paid, it’s all insurance policies. There is no money, it’s all admiralty process. You believe that we are under law and can pay our debts and the government doing something wrong. You’re in Looney Tune Land. You will never get a remedy with your stinking thinking. You have got to understand who it is you are.

Now as Gene stated, your exemption only belongs to living people and it is deemed intellectual property. And intellectual property is personal property. There are personal property and real property. Real property is immovable property and personal property is portable. And your intellectual property, your exemption, is personal property which means it can leave you in chunks and go to other people as you surrender it. So as you surrender your exemption to the public, they use it. An exemption can be a commercial lien and you can resell your lien to other parties. A lien is nothing more than a Bill of Exchange. Once you have given your signature and offered your exemption the party receiving your signature can put your signature on collateral derivative documents and reuse it over and over again.

Your exemption is the intellectual, the personal property, the foundation of being able to move charges from the credit side of the ledger to the debit side of the ledger. The credit side of the ledger is the public side and all the credits are defined to be liabilities. That’s why when you receive a check it’s a liability, evidence of a debt, a promise to pay, there’s no asset there. It’s a futures contract. It’s an insurance policy floating around. The debit side of the account is the assets; it’s on the private side. You cannot move and post things form the credit to the debit side. They are apples and oranges and they do not mix.

Your bill of exchange goes to the debit side. It’s an asset. And in order for them to do a corresponding accounting settlement on the credit side, requires a warrant or an order on the public side. If the exemption is used voluntarily you can move the charge from the credit to the debit, settling and closing the Account. The US is basically foreign to us. When Gene started getting into some of the remedies in his seminar he was talking exactly about what we’ve been saying that when we get the stipulation in terms of the offer, the charge, and we’ve done an acceptance for valuable consideration and we’ve done a return for post settlement and closure and the other side does not issue the order or the warrant to post the compensation and consideration to the public side of the account, we do the certificate of protest and the notice of protest and have that served properly upon the other party who is in dishonor. Then what is the remedy?

Gene suggested we should look to Title 10 of the UNITED STATES CODE, Section 4801 Uniform Foreign Judgments Act, because your certificate of protest and notice of protest is a foreign default. It’s entirely possible that the remedies might exist through title 10, section 4801 and 10 CFR and the regulations promulgated thereto to bring to the us district court possible notice and registration of this form.

Remember particularly in criminal cases, all the state traffic and all the other judgments are being bought up as bid bonds by the U. S. DISTRICT COURTS and those bid bonds, when they are not paid by way of your exemption, then the defendant is in default and based on the default, the bid bonds go out publicly to a whole list of hundreds of corporations, all across the US and internationally and these people purchase the bid bonds. Why would these corporations like Wal-Mart, US Post Office, everyone want to purchase these bid bonds? To make money. What is the purpose of the corporations assuming these bonds? Collateral to invest and expand their businesses.

Hasn’t a friend in Minnesota, Wisconsin been telling us for a long time that the whole system is operating on municipal bonds? Isn’t a municipality nothing more than this private US corporation? Aren’t the US District courts providing the fundamental bid bonds as the foundation to create “money” i.e., this money is credit money. What is credit? Liability. And isn’t this the sale of the municipal bonds which goes down to Paine Webber which acquires these securities by underwriting half of thousands of US corporations to fund their business expansions? How are the corporations doing business? They are doing business by acquiring the investment securities at the lowest level which are then being insured by the performance insurance companies, indemnifying them against loss on collections, which then goes to the security underwriters to raise the funds in the public market places. The municipal bonds for funding and approval for all these projects get approved to finance the wonderful world of Babylon. When someone asked Gene how do you get someone out of jail one of the things he said was, “first if you’re going to get yourself out of jail, you’re going to have to do the registration on the UCC to separate you from the Straw-man so that you have the capacity to act as the Creditor/Intervener.

Eventually you’ll have to go online in the court system and you’re going to have to find out which corporation purchased your bid bond through the U.S. district court. Then you’re going to have to do an acceptance for value and consideration and return, ask for post-settlement and closure by the use of your exemption. That will start you on that process. This is the end of tape 2.

Top 12 Steps to Reclaim Your Estate – Birthright Citizenship vs Corporate Slave Citizenship

Reposting here.

By Anna Von Reitz

Tue, Apr 14, 2015

Via www.MorningLiberty.com

I am not an activist. I am a Judge of the Alaska State Superior Court, and the Alaska State is one of Several States guaranteed the land jurisdiction of Alaska by Statehood Compact. That means that what I did here in Alaska directly impacts what applies to every other State on the land of the Continental United States including Washington State.

If no properly convened Washington State Court (not State of Washington which is a “State of State” — a Federal State– operating in the international jurisdiction of the sea) overturns my findings and Public Order, you will find that I already addressed the criminality of the North American Power Alliance and their subsidiaries. See attached Public Order and Notice to Law Enforcement (including Judges).  If you would like to get to the heart of this matter and put an end to such encroachment upon the land jurisdiction of your state and its citizenry, there are some (relatively) simple steps to be taken.

  1. Everyone must choose their proper citizenship. Do you want your birthright citizenship on the land of the Washington (or other) State on the land jurisdiction of the Continental United States guaranteed to the United Colonies and carrying with it all your guarantees to the Bill of rights, etc., or do you want to adopt “corporate citizenship” as a franchise owned and operated by other corporate entities and operate as a debt slave in international jurisdiction of the sea for the benefit of the FEDERAL RESERVE and the UNITED NATIONS, INC.?
  2. All those who wish to retain their birthright — gather together and begin operating your County and State on the Land, known as Washington State, not “State of Washington”. Notify the Registrars operating in the Counties where you were born with a sworn affidavit that you are above the age of 21 and are the rightful Entitlement Holder of [YOUR NAME IN ALL CAPITAL LETTERS] ESTATE. To prove this you will need at least two competent witnesses who know you and know your family and who can identify you in a photo included as part of the Witness Affidavit and verify your current address and at least the town address of where you were born. Typically this will be an older friend or family member—- “I am the natural person John William Wiley, a family friend and physician of the McClusky Family of Duluth, Minnesota, for the past thirty-nine years. I was the attending physician when….” or “I am John Bruce Richards, older Cousin of Lilian Diane Cooper. I was 19 when Lilian-Diane was born and have a complete recollection of her parents, birth in Peoria, Illinois, and her life ever since. I can competently identify the woman in the photo shown below as Lilian Diane Cooper, now married to Joshua Rayburn Clarke, of Piedmont Park, California.” Your current address will have to be corrected— you are zip code exempt, write out the whole state name, and if you have a Post Office Box change it to a General Post Office Box (Whatever number) via a change of address card.  You will also need a long form Birth Certificate that has been Authenticated by the Secretary of State of the Birth State for use in a non-Hague Convention Country like Indonesia or Taiwan. In most States you can just order the BC from Vital Statistics and for an extra fee request that it be sent to the Secretary of State for the Authentication and then all sent to you without going back and forth. Once you get the authenticated BC you never let it out of your hands again.  You make copies of the BC and the Authentication and write “For Administrative Use Only” in red on the face of these copies and then on the back you write (also in red) “I certify as Document Holder that this is a true and correct copy of the Birth Certificate and Authentication on file..” — Signed Upper and Lower Case, all rights reserved, and sealed on the Signature with your thumbprint, also in red. Copies of the self-certified Authenticated BC, the Witness Affidavits signed before a public notary under a statement to the effect “Witness by Notary does not change Jurisdiction from the Land” written above the Notary block, and your own Affidavit should be entered on the public record of the probate court in the county of your birth. Request certified copies of the public record created.
  3. Once this process is completed and your claim is received, posted on the public record of the probate court, and you have your certified copy of the action, you are the recognized Executor of your own ESTATE trust. You really always were the lawful Entitlement Holder— the rats just “misunderstood on purpose” in order to defraud you and control your assets.
  4. Now you are the Executor of the ESTATE and they have to do exactly what you tell them to do and they cannot interfere whatsoever. They can no longer harass you or presume upon you or make false claims against you. No judge can act as an Executor de Son Tort with regard to your assets.
  5. You, meanwhile, have fully realized that there are three versions of “United States” in play. There’s the Continental United States (land) for example, Ohio State, and there’s the Federal United States (sea) for example, the State of Ohio, and the Corporate United State, also known as the Municipal United States, which also operates in the international jurisdiction of the sea, for example, the STATE OF OHIO. The actual nation is the State which holds land jurisdiction, All the others are corporations— “inchoate States” that exist on paper only— and which as Federal “States” have *no authority on the land except* that which directly pertains to their own Federal Citizens (federal civilian and military employees, African-Americans, those born in DC, Guam, etc., welfare recipients, and poltiical asylum seekers) or actual federal property— docks, customs houses, arsenals, etc. that have been officially granted to the federal union.
  6. Standing as the Lawful Entitlement Holder and as an American State Citizen on the land jurisdiction of the Continental United States, you are empowered to serve as a juror of the Continental United States so long as you are not a member of the Bar Association and have attained the age of 21. If you meet the other requirements (age, education, etc.,) that were established for public offices of the land-based State prior to 1860 or meet those requirements adopted by the local citizens of the County now, you may operate as a Judge, Sheriff, Grand Juror, Coroner, or in any office of the State on the land or the County or the Township, so long as you are not a member of the Bar Association.
  7. Be aware that the Titles of Nobility Amendment ratified prior to the Civil War and incorporated into the actual equity contract known as The Constitution for the united States of America is still in effect and it still prohibits Bar Association Members from holding any public office of the Continental United States. All these “courts” you see and all these “judges” operating them are operating in a purely private capacity — as corporate administrative tribunals and as military tribunals. The proof of this is plain to see— all “State Statutes” they use are privately copyrighted and so, are not public documents. The flags in their courtrooms are all “Executive Flags” of the Commander in Chief—- they are operating in “Special Admiralty”— and falsely presuming that you are an “Enemy Combatant” or “POW” ,etc., instead of recognizing that you are a civilian. Once you put this nonsense to rest by reclaiming your ESTATE from the probate court, they face court-martial and death penalty criminal charges if they continue to take such actions against you.
  8. As the Lawful Citizenry of the Continental United States you each have more civil authority in your little finger than the entire “federal government”. You hold plenary jurisdiction over the land and its assets. Any attempt to boss you around while you are standing on State land or on your own property is a breach of jurisdiction. Any crime committed on federal property is of course another matter. If you engage in actual international commerce the federales have something to say about it, but most Americans are only engaged in peaceful trade among other organic states of the union. The federal union may only promote and regulate trade among the States *so as to encourage and expedite such trade. *They are *not allowed to restrict *our internal trade.
  9. Start reading The Constitution for the united States of America —- the actual Constitution not the corporate fake called the Constitution of the United States of America. The real Constitution is very brief — ten Articles, three Amendments, including the Titles of Nobility of Amendment which the later corporate fakes do not include. This document is the only treaty and equity contract tying us to the British-controlled Federal United States. *The United Colonies still hold the complete and plenary jurisdiction and extends it to every “State” formed, whether on the land or the sea (corporate). *
  10. *Bear in mind that the land jurisdiction includes all actual material associated with the land— soil, plants, minerals, people, buildings, animals— all land assets and you have plenary jurisdiction on the land of the nation States. The Federal United States has plenary jurisdiction on “the High Seas and Inland Waterways” and otherwise has only the right to speak to its own Federal Citizens who are “residing” on the land. You don’t “reside” on the land— you “inhabit” the land. The problem has been that they have been “offering” to contract— actually racketeering and press-ganging on the land jurisdiction and forcing American State Citizens to contract with them under conditions of nondisclosure and semantic deceit, allowing them to falsely claim that we are corporate franchisees or even corporate franchises of their foreign federation and its various corporations. *
  11. *Now you begin to see where your power lies and how you must exercise it. We have been swamped with pirates and armed marauders who are our employees operated under diabolical misappropriation by governmental services corporations that are in turn owned and operated by international banking cartels. * *Here’s an example— the FEDERAL RESERVE newly organized as a franchise of the UNITED NATIONS, INC. is fronting its own franchise doing business as THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INC. This entity has created hundreds of millions of “public utilities” operated under the given names of living Americans — you can recognize these new corporate franchise doppelgangers because they all use names in this form: JOHN Q. PUBLIC.* *So, are you a public utility owned and operated by a franchise subsidiary of the FEDERAL RESERVE banking cartel operated by the UNITED NATIONS, INC.? * *No? * *Time to stand up and shove this baloney.*
  12. *The effort is underway to put an end to this criminal fraud scheme and seize back the assets of the Continental United States that have been stolen and plundered by the Federal United States corporations and misdirected employees. You can help by donating time, money, and skills to educate others and to document and prosecute claims. Also time to repudiate the Odious “National Debt” and reclaim the credit and assets which have been purloined by various “State of” franchises via fiduciary trust fraud and fraudulent convertible debt.*

Documentary about Curfew Protests

Our group of people, of all ages, protested the San Diego curfew back in 1997. Here is a documentary about the protests and our tactics. I still support using the first amendment as a defense against the curfew. Meaning, you would state you are engaged in free speech by wearing a sticker, or peaceably assembling, or writing a story as a journalist and claiming the freedom of the press. However, we now feel it’s better to challenge the jurisdiction of the police, the city government, and the courts (actually banks). This is complex but much more powerful and will help in many other areas of life. Note this is not legal advice. Just details about what I might do. Notice that you are responsible for your actions. More details are here.

The Wizard of Oz – An Allegory

(author unknown) 

An allegory (parable) is the expression of truths about human conduct and experience by means of symbolic fictional figures and actions.

Such was the movie The Wizard of Oz, an allegory of the state of affairs we now live in today — an allegory of the unfolding New World Order that was instituted in America via the stock- market crash of 1929 and the bankruptcy of the United States in 1933.

The setting of this allegory is in Kansas — the “heartland” of America; the geographical center of the U.S.A.

In came the twister — the whirling confusion of the Great Depression, the stock-market crash, the U.S. Bankruptcy, and the theft of America’s gold — that whisked Dorothy and Toto up into the New Order of the World; an artificial new dimension “somewhere, over the rainbow,” above the solid ground of Kansas.

When they landed in Oz, Dorothy commented to her little dog Toto: “Toto? I have a feeling we’re not in Kansas anymore . . .” Exactly!

After the bankruptcy of the United States, Kansas was no longer “Kansas” anymore, it is now “KS” — a two-capital-letter federal postal designation that is part of the “federal zone,” designated by the Zone ImProvement (ZIP) Code established by the bankrupt United States in 1933 — and Dorothy and Toto were now “in this state.” The terms: “in this state,” “this state,” and “state” are deceptively defined for tax jurisdiction purposes as the “District of Columbia,” a.k.a. the United States, Inc., or the corporate United States.

In the 1930s the all-capital-letter-written-name strawman — the newly created artificial “person” that has no brain and speaks and acts for its onceupon-a-time sovereign, you and me — was created while Americans were confused and distracted by the commotion caused by the introduction of the New World Order of communistic socialism, to figure out that they even had a strawman with which to contend. The scarecrow identified this strawman persona for Dorothy thusly: “Some people without brains do an awful lot of talking. Of course, I’m not bright about doing things.”

In his classic song, “If I Only Had A Brain,” the scarecrow/strawman succinctly augured, “I’d unravel every riddle, For every Individual, In trouble or in pain.”

Individual: a United States government Employee. (Title 5 USC §552(a)2). The Internal Revenue Code (IRC) and all state tax codes are in harmony with the above definition of “individual” by reference only. A corporation-of-one is an artificial person constructed by law; not a living, breathing man or woman. An “individual” is a public corporate persona existing only in the public (government) domain having been created by law, not by God.

The drafters of codes and laws take everyday common speech and give it arcane encrypted meanings that are generally unknown or unknowable to the uninitiated even after serious study.

Therefore, most folks are commercially, legally, and financially enslaved because of their ignorance of the true situation. Even knowing that “ignorance of the law is no excuse” they find themselves helpless, unarmed, and uninformed. [Upon close examination one can see a direct tie in with America’s secret establishment known as the Order of Skull & Bones, as it was brought about to bring down the united States of America, its members have penetrated just about every significant research, policy, opinion-making organization in the United States as well as many of the leading educational institutions. Also known as ‘the dumbing down’ of America. (If you had trouble reading the previous sentence blame your poor educational experience as a result of the influence of the Order of Skull & Bones and its members.)]

Translation: Once we discover that our strawman exists, and that we have co-signed for him [signing by accommodation], political and legal mysteries, complexities, and confusions are resolved. When we take title to our strawman (UCC1 financing statement), we protect ourselves from any liabilities that we might otherwise occur.

The tin-man, our Taxpayer-Identification-Number (TIN) man, is a hollow man of tin, a vessel, or vehicle; newly created code words for our strawman. [not being sexist here as one could say, ‘hollow woman of tin’ or ‘strawwoman’.]

Just as the strawman has no brain, the tin-man vessel/vehicle has no heart. Both are artificial persons. (person = persona = mask). [Learn up on the word, ‘person’]

Persons are divided by law into natural and artificial. Natural persons are persons created by God, and artificial persons are persons devised by human law for the purpose of governing them as “corporations-of-one” or bodies-politic.

The precise definition of the term “person” is therefore necessary to identify those to whom the 14th Amendment to the Constitution affords its protections and liabilities, since the 14th Amendment expressly applies to “persons.”

A strawman is a person with a fictitious name written in “legalese” — language foreign to the rules of English grammar. Flesh and blood men and women with names [titles] written in [hand] cursive, with initial-letters-only capitalized, are not “persons” even though they are referred to as natural persons at times.

It is as impossible for a person to be natural as it is for a man to be artificial. “Person” is a silent artificial construct hatched up by lawyers, to be used and controlled by lawyers’ encrypted “codes.”

One of the definitions of “tin” found in Webster’s dictionary is “counterfeit.” The tin-man represents the mechanical and heartless aspect of commerce and commercial law. Just like they say in the Mafia, as they throw you overboard, you feet in concrete overshoes, “Nothing personal; [its] just business.”

The heartless tin-man carried an “axe,” a traditional symbol for God, and for modern commercial law, in most dominant civilizations, including fascist states. In the words of the tin-man, as he expressed relief after Dorothy had oiled his arm, “I’ve held that axe up for ages.”

The word “ace” is etymologically related to the word “axe” and in a deck of cards the only card above the King is the Ace − God. One of the Axis Powers of World War II was a fascist state, Italy. The symbol for fascism is the “fasces,” a bundle of rods with an ax bound up in it with its blade sticking out.

The fasces may be found on the reverse of the American Mercury-head dime (the Roman deity Mercury was the God of Commerce) and on the wall behind and on each side of the Speaker’s Podium in the United States Senate, each gold fasces being approximately six feet high. At the base of the Seal of the United States Senate are two fasces, crossed.

The lion in the story represents the “at-one-time” fearless American people as having lost their courage. And after a round with the IRS, in “defending” your T-I-N man, dummy corporation, vessel vehicle, individual employee, public corporation, all capital letters written name, artificial person, strawman, you’d lose your courage, too. You perhaps haven’t known it, but the IRS has been dealing with you all along via your tin-man under the hidden laws of commerce. Just like the tin-man, “commerce” has no heart; it is heartless.

To find the Wizard, you have to “follow the yellow-brick road” (the gold-bar road.) Follow the trail of America’s stolen gold and you’ll find the thief who stole it.

In the beginning of the movie, the Wizard’s counterpart was the traveling mystic, “Professor Marvel” who Dorothy encountered when she ran away with Toto. His macabre shingle touted that he was “…acclaimed by The Crowned Heads of Europe, Past, Present, and Future.” Professor Marvel must have really been a Wizard to be acclaimed so by the future Crowned Heads of Europe, even before they were crowned!

Before the bankers stole America, they had longsince overpowered the Christian Kings and Queens of Europe and looted their kingdoms. Maybe “Professor Marvel” knew something about the future that other folks didn’t know. With a human skull peering down from its painted perch above the door to his wagon, the professor lectured When Dorothy Gale and her new friends emerged from the forest, they were elated to see the Emerald City before them, only a short distance away. The Wicked Witch of the West, desperate for the ruby slippers that Dorothy was wearing, would have to make her move before our heroes arrived safely inside the Emerald City gates.

In the original book, The Wonderful Wizard of Oz, by Frank Baum, published 39 years before the movie came out in 1939, and three years before the crash, the slippers were not ruby-red, but silver.

America still had its gold at that time, and the value of 1 oz. of gold was set at 15 oz. of silver; silver – then as now- being the more plentiful. Backed by gold, the currency of the day carried America to a position of pre-eminence throughout the world. But when the movie came out in 1939, the slippers were not silver, but ruby red.

Between the years 1916 and 1933, America’s gold was absorbed by the private non-federal Federal Reserve and shipped off to the FED’s owners in Germany and England because the use of Federal Reserve Notes carried an interest penalty that could only be paid in gold. Our former currency, United States Notes, carried no such interest requirement, but such was the “bargain” that came with the New World Order of the nonfederal Federal Reserve in 1913.

When the United States’ Bankruptcy was declared in 1933, Americans were forced to turn in (surrender) all their gold coin, gold bullion, and gold certificates by May 1st — “May Day” — the birthday of the Communism and the Illuminati in 1776, the year that the American Colonists declared their independence from the Crown.

Talking to people who were alive at that time, the general sentiment toward such “theft” in 1933 bordered on a second revolutionary war.

Maybe it was too much of a clue, or too much salt in their wounds, for Dorothy to be skipping down the golden yellow-brick-road in a pair of silver slippers. So, for whatever reason, a color less likely to provoke the people was selected.

With regard to the choice of ruby slippers — slippers colored red — one explanation is that on commercial documents and the like, red signifies private as opposed to public. Your new Social Security Card has a red serial number on the reverse. But no matter their color in the movie, the Wicked Witch of the West had big plans to get her hands on the precious slippers before Dorothy and crew could make it to Emerald City.

Her tactic was to drug them into unconsciousness by covering the countryside with poppy flowers, poppies — the source of heroin, opium, and morphine — and then waltz in and snatch the slippers. In other words, the best way to loot the gold was to dull the senses of the American people with a contrived crisis (the Great Depression.) And of course now we have illicit street drugs, heroin, cocaine, etc., and legal drugs such as Ridlin®, etc. and television, bogus media dishing out control propaganda, etc. …etc.

The poppy-drugs worked on Dorothy, the lion and Toto — the flesh-and-blood entities — but had no effect on the scarecrow or the tin-man — the artificial entities. The two cried out for help, and Glenda — the Good Witch of the North — answered their cries with a blanket of snow that nullified the narcotic effect of the poppies on Dorothy, Toto, and the lion.

As they all scampered toward the Emerald City — the city of green non-federal Federal Reserve Notes (the new fiat money – money by decree) — we hear the Munchkins singing the glories of the Wizard’s Creation:

“You’re out of the woods, Your out of the dark, Your out of the night. Step into the sun, Step into the light, Keep straight ahead for the most glorious place on the face of the earth or the stars!”

This jingle abounds with Illuminati/Luciferian metaphors regarding darkness and light.

The Wicked Witch of the West made her home in a round medieval Watchtower — ancient symbol of The Knights Templar of Freemasonry who are given to practicing witchcraft and are also credited to be the originators of modern banking, circa 1099 A.D.

The Wicked Witch of the West was dressed in black, the color that symbolizes the planet Saturn, a sacred icon of The Knights Templar, and [interestingly] the “color of choice” of judges and priests for their robes.

Who was the Wicked Witch of the West? Remember, in the first part of the film her counterpart was Almira Gulch who, according to Auntie Em, “…owned half the county.” Miss Gulch alleged that Dorothy’s dog, Toto, had bitten her. She came to the farm with an “Order from the Sheriff” demanding that they surrender Toto to her custody and control. Auntie Em was not immediately cooperative and answered Miss Gulch’s allegations that Toto had bitten her, “He’s really gentle — with gentle people, that is.”

When Miss. Gulch challenged them to withhold Toto from her and “…go against the law,” dear old Auntie Em was relegated to “pushing the Party Line” for Big Brother government. Auntie Em dutifully succumbed to the pressure and counseled Dorothy, reluctantly, “We can’t go against the law, Dorothy. I’m afraid poor Toto will have to go.”

When Dorothy refused to surrender Toto Miss Gulch lashed out: “If you don’t hand over that dog I’ll bring a suit that’ll take your whole farm!”

Today >70% of all attorneys in the world reside in the West — in America to be exact — and =>95% of all law suites in the world are filed under the jurisdiction of the corporate United States. The Wicked Witch of the West and Miss Gulch symbolize Judges and Attorneys — primary agents for the transfer of all wealth in America from the people to the United States, the United Nations, and the international banks. [Study the word, “attorn(ey)”]

The American Bar Association is a branch of the Bar Council, under the Bar Association of England and Wales. (British Accreditation Registry) [Some believe it to be a religious association run by Esquires of the middle temple of the city of London – not as in London, England but a particular place in the city of London.] As the copyrighted property of a British Company, all states’ and United States Codes are private British owned Law, and all states’ and United States courts, state Bar Associations, and the “State of [name each of the 50 States],” go by and enforce private de facto British owned Law against Americans, operating as private foreign owned tribunals or administrative agencies doing business in the states under cover and color of [each of the 50 states’] Law. The Wicked Witch of the West wanted the ruby (silver) slippers (the precious metals) — and her counterpart, Miss. Gulch, wanted Toto, too. What does “toto” signify in attorney legalese? “Everything!” Miss Gulch wanted to take everything.

Dorothy and the gang fell for the Wizard’s illusion in the beginning, but soon wised up and discovered the Wizard for what he was [is], a confidence man. When asked about helping the scarecrow/strawman, the Wizard cited — among other babblings about “getting a brain” and “universities” — the land of “E Pluribus Unum” (Latin for “One out of many”); converting many into one; meaning the New World Order.

“Novus Ordo Seclorum” is the Latin phrase placed on the American one-dollar bill shortly after the bankruptcy of the U.S. Government was declared in 1933. The Wizard proudly revealed (confessed) that he was, “… Born and bred in the heart of the western wilderness – an old Kansas man myself.”

The bankers did quite well. And, as the Wizard said, they made a killing in the America west with the theft of America’s gold, labor, and property from the grateful and responsive rural folk” (a quoted phrase of John D. Rockefeller) who populated the country at that time.

When Dorothy asked Glenda, the Good Witch of the North for help in getting back to Kansas, Glenda replied, “You don’t need to be helped; you’ve always had the power to go back to Kansas.”

Translation: You’ve always had the right and power to re-claim your sovereignty; you just forgot your remedy; a UCC1 Form and Security Agreement sent to the Secretary of State and an Invoice and Bill of Exchange to the Secretary of the Treasury, which can be completed from scratch in a very short time.

Remedy: Remedy is the means by which the violation of a right is prevented, redressed, or compensated. Both remedy and rights include those remedial rights of self-help which are among the most important bodies of rights under the Universal Commercial Code (UCC). Remedial rights are rights an aggrieved party can resort to on his own. “Acceptance of Value” is our Remedy.

Americans have intimate firsthand knowledge of the heartless mechanics of the laws of commerce when strictly applied by the unregistered, foreign agents of the IRS.

The Internal Revenue Service is the collection agency for the private non-federal Federal Reserve and the International Monetary Fund. It was placed under the Uniform Commercial Code in 1954 and has been operating strictly in that realm ever since.

You may have wondered about the meaning behind the words, “The Wizard of Oz”? Look them up in the dictionary. Like almost everything else, the ruse is out there in the open for all to see, if you will look, and see.

One definition of Wizard is “a person of high professional skill or knowledge.” Oz is an abbreviation of “onza,” the Italian word for ounce (oz.) or ounces, the unit of measurement of gold and silver and other precious metals. No matter how large the quantity of gold or silver being discussed, the amount is always expressed in ounces rather than hundreds of tons of gold, it’s stated as so many million ounces of gold.

As the factual history of this country attests, “The Wizard of Oz” is the “Wizard of Ounces”, of silver and gold.

Everything worked out for Dorothy (the American people) in the end. In the end she “made it home” to Kansas and her friends.

Meaning: There’s a remedy encoded, disguised, and camouflaged in law. The UCC has been cracked and there’s a way home, just like in the movie. Like Dorothy said, “There’s no place like home” — there’s nothing like sovereignty for a sovereign!

Vice Admiralty courts are courts established in the Queen’s possessions beyond the seas, with jurisdiction over maritime causes and those relating to “prize.” The United States is now a colony (a possession) of the English Crown, per a joint commercial venture agreement between the colonies (the United States) and the Crown, which brought the United States back under British ownership and rule, in 1933.

But the American people had a “standing in law” as sovereigns, independent of any connection to the United States and the Crown. This “standing in law” necessitated that the people be brought back under British rule, quietly and one at a time — but the Commercial Process of Redemption, through the UCC, will redeem us from this travesty.

All courts in America are Vice-Admiralty courts conducting the private foreign commerce of the Crown. But there is commercial remedy in Redemption-in-Law.

Will you continue to be conned by confidence men into worshiping the Wizard’s light-show or will you look behind the veil?

With Lawful Excuse

CFR 11.4 – withApplicable principles of law.

(a) General intent. All actions taken by the Accused that are necessary for completion of a crime must be performed with general intent. This intent is not listed as a separate element. When the mens rea required for culpability to attach involves an intent that a particular consequence occur, or some other specific intent, an intent element is included. The necessary relationship between such intent element and the conduct constituting the actus reus is not articulated for each set of elements, but is presumed; a nexus between the two is necessary.

(b) The element of wrongfulness and defenses. Conduct must be wrongful to constitute one of the offenses enumerated herein or any other offense triable by military commission. Conduct is wrongful if it is done without justification or excuse cognizable under applicable law. The element of wrongfulness (or the absence of lawful justification or excuse), which may be required under the customary law of armed conflict, is not repeated in the elements of crimes in § 11.6. Conduct satisfying the elements found herein shall be inferred to be wrongful in the absence of evidence to the contrary. Similarly, this part does not enunciate defenses that may apply for specific offenses, though an Accused is entitled to raise any defense available under the law of armed conflict.

Defenses potentially available to an Accused under the law of armed conflict, such as self-defense, mistake of fact, and duress, may be applicable to certain offenses subject to trial by military commission. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, defenses in individual cases shall be presumed not to apply. The burden of going forward with evidence of lawful justification or excuse or any applicable defense shall be upon the Accused. With respect to the issue of combatant immunity raised by the specific enumeration of an element requiring the absence thereof, the prosecution must affirmatively prove that element regardless of whether the issue is raised by the defense.

Once an applicable defense or an issue of lawful justification or lawful excuse is fairly raised by the evidence presented, except for the defense of lack of mental responsibility, the burden is on the prosecution to establish beyond a reasonable doubt that the conduct was wrongful or that the defense does not apply. With respect to the defense of lack of mental responsibility, the Accused has the burden of proving by clear and convincing evidence that, as a result of a severe mental disease or defect, the Accused was unable to appreciate the nature and quality of the wrongfulness of the Accused’s acts. As provided in 32 CFR 9.5(c), the prosecution bears the burden of establishing the Accused’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt in all cases tried by a military commission. Each element of an offense enumerated herein must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt.

(c) Statute of limitations. Violations of the laws of war listed herein are not subject to any statute of limitations.

Gary This is Keven – Eliminating U.S. Citizen Status

Eliminating U.S. Citizen Status

Trading with the Enemy Act

November 26, 2006
http://www.sendnomo ney.com/Sound/ July_2006_ Gary_This_ is_Keven. mp3
Removal from Enemy of the State database

Obtaining Diplomatic Standing in National Crime Information System – NCF

No Driver License

Identification Apostiled by SOS

            (Plan to register ID with the Hague )

  1. Declare citizenship on the land. Establish proper political standing. International law, the law of nations and the treaty of nations, guarantees every man the right to make political self determination.
  2. Sever the legal relationship between the man and the person of the defendant, known as the vessel. In Admiralty court the defendant is always called the person of the defendant, the vessel. ( Admiralty Law, West, “In an Admiralty in rem action, jurisdiction over the person of the defendant, the vessel is premised on the presence of the vessel within the district in which the court sits.”)

The vessel resides in the District of Columbia as does the situs of the court. We are a fiduciary for the vessel because there is a trust sitting behind the vessel. So you want to collapse the trust. When you collapse the trust, the relationship with the vessel goes away.

One collapses the trust by appointing the original fiduciary (creator of the trust) for that vessel as the fiduciary (trustee) again with a affidavit of appointment of fiduciary. Any time the trustee and the beneficiary (or the creator) become the one and the same, the trust dissolves and disappears. Law of Trusts, Austin Wakeman Scott, 5 volumes, 1956; Scott on Trusts, 2 volumes.

When the trust is dissolved, and you are no longer the fiduciary, the government has no jurisdiction to take you into the court.

In order to establish authority to appoint a new fiduciary, one has to file a lien against the vessel recorded in the county record . The lien provides authority to appoint a new fiduciary. Then one records the lien on a UCC1. Whittier Law Brief on UCC Filings 1007. (90 pgs), Whittier Law College . (Lewis did this after release)

Serve notice on the original registrar that they are the original fiduciary, that they are being reappointed as fiduciary and send a copy of that to six federal agencies, including:

  1. District IRS office
  2. Commissioner of IRS

One does this by (similar to Acceptance for Value) a twenty line overlay on the front of the birth certificate. On the back side of the birth certificate, put a $1 red fox stamp and to the left of it write “See attached document for appointment of new fiduciary” Signed and dated over the stamp and have notarized. Send the original to the court and certified copies to everybody and their brother. All action in the court ceased.

November 3rd Judge issued a warrant (to arrest Lewis), without naming the person to be arrested. November 4 th the Clerk issued a warrant, without the judges signature and no court seal and no one has executed it. Lewis was sentenced for 10 months and three years of supervised release. Lewis visited the probation officer three times only.

  1. Declaration of  Citizenship ( pursuant to Trading With Enemy Act, TWEA)
  2. Sever Legal relationship with the vessel and eliminate all fiduciary liability
  3. Eliminate Social Security Adhesions
  4. Eliminate other public contracts, such as driver license, voter registration, etc.
  5. Execute a contract with John Snow, Secretary of Treasury, under 40 Stat 411, TWEA, for protection and whatever else you would like him to do. Section 16 says that “When you have proper standing as a non U.S. citizen but as one of the people they must provide you with protection. The missing key was collapsing the trust.

The way one collapses the trust is by appointing the original fiduciary (creator) as fiduciary again. The State Registrar was the creator of the vessel and the birth certificate, the originator of the trust. One has 30 days from the eighteenth birthday to revoke the trust.  His name should be at the bottom of the birth certificate.

One must notify:

  1. Comptroller of the Bankruptcy, because of the affect on the banking system
  2. Secretary of state
  3. Commissioner of IRS, because of the effect on his records
  4. U.S. Attorney General
  5. Associate U.S. Attorney General
  6. Chief Counsel of the Office of Foreign Asset Control pursuant to 40 Stat 411.

Until these agents are properly notified of the Declaration of Citizenship and the Change in Fiduciary Relationship, one will not be out of the system.

The last step is to create a self executing contract with Mr. John Snow to have him do everything you want him to do pursuant to 40 Stat 411 and 31 CFR 500 & 501 (300 pages). He is given 30 days to respond. If he does not respond, one records an affidavit of non response on the 35 th day. Do not record the original document. Only record the affidavit of non response. Serve all the above agents with a notice of non response.

In another 30 days Snow has a fiduciary obligation to perform under 40 Stat 411. He has been performing every time. If you give him an order to expunge the case, he has to do it.

Charlie: “If you gave him an order to open his treasury account and expose the accounting, he has to do it.”

Lewis: “Actually he doesn’t. You can achieve that by going to the Secretary of State. There are two accounts there. We asked for the accounting on one account and they gave us the balance of over $400 million.”

Under 40 Stat 411 there are two accounts specified. They are specified in 1923 dollars to accrue at 5 percent per annum interest. That is the bond they had to put up to support their system for every man, woman and child in this nation. This was before the Roosevelt administration changed it in 1933. They put this in place so that Roosevelt could make all the persons in the nation enemies of the state.

Charlie: I verified last week that I created an account in the FED based on the documents that you got and that is the only one that will be issued.

Lewis: I know specifically that I have two accounts under the same number that I have verified.

C: I put a call on the FED for more than the national debt recently. Do you understand what I mean by a call? I believe we can access our account in a very secure way.

L: I have a problem with the banks stealing my instruments.

C: What are you going to do with a bank? I can show you how to deal with that. There are a lot of coincidences here…

L: You will be able to get funds guaranteed to you under TWEA.

C: Federal court rules tells you exactly how to register the contract and how to enforce it. There is an issue between John Snow and the FED.

L: It is simpler to do a contract with Snow. After one has a contract set up with Snow, I have an instrument that works, if you can get the bank to execute it. I had two banks steal the instruments.

C: How much do you know about their corporate charter? How familiar are you with the distresses? Are you aware that you can get the Federal Court Clerk to perfect the distresses for you within the court rules? He is the sole exclusive party that can execute the instrument. He is the fiduciary over all the accounts. He is the fiduciary for anyone signed up with that system,

L: Yes, under 28 USC 2367. The feds were after me because I had claims against two banks for $39m and $14.7m. Pluses exposed the fraud being perpetrated by the banks. That is why they raided my home. In my case, they got the originals from my home and purged everything in the public recorders office.

C: Have you seen our acceptance of oath we have been using and the closure of the account on the indictment? I will send it to you. Spread it around.

L: They cannot attach a creditor. Snow has fiduciary liability once you have upper standing. The key is that it is bonded. I sent Snow a copy of:

  1. the bond and
  2. a certification of the bond which is a separate document.
  3. I sent him a copy of the declaration of citizenship, and
  4. The appointment of the new fiduciary

I asked him to fix the problem that one of his rogue tax collectors caused. They release the guy eight days after it was received by Snow. So far, we have been successful on every one. We have finished this twelve times in four states.

One of our guys was a fugitive for a couple of years. The feds were after him. He had served three years on a five year sentence and they gave him ten years of supervised release. He never reported to the probation officer. We did the five steps for him and about six weeks after the last step, he was arrested by the FBI. When they took him into court, the prosecutor refused to come to the hearing. The judge called the US Attorney by cell phone from the courtroom. And the attorney said “The United States had no interest in this matter. What you do with him is up to you.” The Judge rescheduled the hearing and demanded the attorney dismiss the charges in person. There six guys with the prosecutor from the US Attorney Generals office in Washington DC . One of them repeated what the attorney said previously and that the judge was on his own personal liability.  The judge dismissed the case.

One of the six attorneys went into the judges chambers. They processed the prisoner and escorted him to the front desk within 15 minutes, where one of the US Attorneys was waiting for him. “Here is my business card; it has a 24 hour hot line number. If anybody ever bothers you again, call immediately. We will take care of it.”

After you execute the contract with Snow under the provisions of TWEA, 40 Stat 411, Sections 7, 9 and 16, this is the result. It says that after one has proper standing, and have established a relationship with the Comptroller, they have a duty to protect you. They are bonded to do so and they have taken an oath to do so. They are all operating as a military status.

C: I have a good relationship with the person that owns the gold that the U.S. is using for a bond.

L: The pay of a treasury agent is the same a the pay of a first lieutenant. And they have the same clearances. They are operating under martial law.

I recommend a very good set of books on the history of US law called the National Law Library, by Collier, 1939, 6 volumes. They are available on EBay for less than $100. It tells you what to do to turn the system around.

C: Breach of peace is the highest crime under international law. We set up a claim in 2003, recorded in Georgia . Ten federal agencies along with some people from Europe , tried to get it out of the recorders office. But the recorder went to a state judge and got an order for them to cease and desist. The European central bank wants to buy it at face value.

I don’t care if they give me specie or FRN’s because they are still bonded with gold. They are private notes, so there has to be a bond on them and I know the party that has the bond on them. One of the notes in the Perry case was handed to me for execution last week. Of the nine documents that were on the pile, the last one was an insurance premium paid by the FED owners from day one.
L: I did a demonstration for a couple of friends on how to handle a traffic stop. I sped past a policeman without license plates or any identification. When I gave my Christian appellation and my status, to him, he went back and checked it on his radio and turned his lights off and asked my passengers: “Do you have the same standing as this man?” They said no. So he said “That is too bad. If it was up to me, you could all go now. But now I will have to have my sergeant make this decision.”

I had no proof that I had diplomatic status. But they treat me with a great deal of respect.

The US has been under the rule of the Vatican since the beginning because they are a corporation sole under the Vatican . On Monday a new set of rules took affect regarding aircraft. The International Mobile Registry is the place to register all aircraft for all treaty nations to the Cape Town Agreement of 2001.

It is all private law, not International law. It is owned by the same people that own public law 88-243 (1968), the UCC. 88-244 is the club of Rome . The UCC was written and is owned by UNIDROIT. It is in the Vatican . The U.S. pays $260,000 per year to them for the use of the UCC. The International Registry is the private law of UNIDROIT.

C: Public Law 88-244 (1963) The U.S. …all its law through the private club of Rome which is UNIDROIT.  
www.unidroit. org

 

Scathing commentary that gov’t schools are monotonous factories

Wow. Wondering how dated and wrong your government/public school is? Well, watch this video, in which the speaker points out that schools stifle creativity and educate people based on their manufacture date (the day they were born), rather than by skill level. This is intentional because if the school content was geared to skill level, than a faster learner could finish the content quicker and leave, thereby avoiding years of mind control and brain washing. If the content is distributed by age, well then you must stay in “school” until you are 16. Then they shame you into staying until the 12th grade and voluntary continuing the madness by going to FOUR years of college about interesting topics that likely won’t help your career.